On 04/11/11 19:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> PS Alex will explain you why "struct" or "class with data members" is >>> bad for *portable* code. >> Taking into an account Dmirty's sample with XSQLDA I must say that may >> be not everything SO bad in this area. At least somehow it did work all >> this time. What is problematic - how to add something to such structures? >> > Nothing is going to be added to this struct. If we need to add something > (batch?) to it must be done now. >
And what if we need some "superbatch" in FB4? > Saying what can be added to it in the future is like saying what if we > need to add parameters to existing functions. Just should not be done > this way. I.e. if we need to add, we just add new methods to all interfaces using this structure? And have 2 versions of such structure? Please notice I do not say it's impossible, but want to have clear understanding of your suggestion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
