On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So it all depends on what you want. If you are looking for speed on Intel
> architecture and are not overly worried about security go with FreeBSD. If
> you are overly worried about security and don't need the extra speed
> FreeBSD generates on Intel architecture (or AMD ect.) then go with OpenBSD.
> BTW, OpenBSD is pretty quick too. Us *BSD bigots stick together so as long
> as you don't eye those darn Linux OSs (or M$) you are safe from retribution
>
Or you could buy some *real* hardware instead of Pea Seas and run
Solaris or AIX :-)
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Not an OS war.. Just a simple question- Free ... rich
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Mikael Olsson
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Jeffery . Gieser
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple qu... Toby A. Rider
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Jeffery . Gieser
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple qu... Toby A. Rider
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Behm, Jeffrey L.
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple qu... Toby A. Rider
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simpl... Richard A. Hill
- Re: Not an OS war.. Just a simple qu... Graham Wheeler
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Jarmoc, Jeff
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Ken Seefried
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Manesh, Nasser \(CAP, PTL\)
- RE: Not an OS war.. Just a simple questi... Manesh, Nasser \(CAP, PTL\)
