> All standards are is somebody's way of saying "I code like > this and so should you."
No, if implemented by a group, they're the group's way of saying, "we code like this and so should you, if you want to be in this group". There's a huge difference between the two. > I read code the way I read music. I don't need a document to > explain to me why the song goes C#, E, B# when I can just > look at the tablature. Why should I want to read through code instead of reading documented method signatures, unless I specifically want to rewrite that code? Tools like Javadoc let you quickly identify the things you need to know - inputs and outputs - and ignore the rest. How the code does what it does is irrelevant if the code is modular as it should be. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
