Tony Peden writes: > > And think carefully about the simplification you propose. Yes, it > > works in most case. But the existing code already works in most cases > > -- all of the situations where we can get away with a simplified > > per-gear model are *also* fine with the existing code. There's no > > point to doing the per-gear stuff if we're not going to see any > > benefit. > > A significant benefit will be had immediately -- the aircraft will > follow the terrain while taxiing and the 3D model will look better.
Also, if we add the ability to get surface attributes, it will be obvious when one wheel slips off the side of the runway onto the grass or gravel. All the best, David -- David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
