> > > > > > ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC AGP (rev 122), 8 MB vram. > > > > > PCI id is 1002:4757 or 1002:475a according to > > > > > http://pciids.sourceforge.net/iii/?s=1&i=1002 > > > ..so, on the Mesa gear demo, I should get like 1500fps on my > > > 200MHz box and over 2000 fps once I have accelleration on my > > > 450MHz box? > > For comparison, my RagePro achieves about 80 on the gears testing, > ..which RagePro? A mach64 card?
Yes. It usually manages 7-15 fps, depending on texture swapping. > > not much slower than software rendering on the P3-600 processor > > itself, while the G200 achieves about 350 in hardware rendering. > ..and the G200 in flightgear achieves? About 10 fps at 1000x700; it uses 16 bit color and depth (an old card). > > > Which one (agp) fits my 450 box the best? > ..come to think of it, I _could_ leave it in and put in > another, but pci card. (My only agp-slot box) Comments? Don't do that. Most modern chipsets use the full AGP feature set. The PCI card is intrinsically much slower and in compatibility mode. > > If you don't mind closed source drivers, spend money on NVidia. > ..I'm the proponent of airworthy source code, remember? ;-) I'm only familiar with the performance of old cards. The Matrox G400 is 'ok'. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
