Tony Peden writes: > The static system will probably be more challenging as that's where most > of the subtle errors seem to crop up. Cessna gives tables relating IAS > to CAS (which is largely the static source error). If that's standard > practice, incorporating a table read-in and lookup might be a good idea.
The CAS/IAS differences are not that big, at least not the for 172. I think that a higher priority will be modelling alt static air from inside the cabin. I will want to work in sideslip errors, though. I would be very grateful for any quick-and-dirty methods for calculating IAS/CAS from the difference between dynamic and static pressure in subsonic flight. Thanks, and all the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
