On 06 Dec 2002 15:14:36 -0800, 
Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 13:12, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:30:32 -0800 (PST), 
> > Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > > 
> > > --- Christian Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Tony Peden wrote:
> > 
> > > > My firewall runs under 2.4 with iptables... I can send you the
> > > > script that sets it up, so you might discover if I made a
> > > > mistake somewhere.
> > > 
> > > I think you want to use the newer ipchains ... I'll check and send
> > > you mine.
> > 
> > ..uhmmm, in ipcop.org, we're actually moving from ipchains and the 
> > 2.2 kernels.  But running ipchains with a 2.4 works fine if you
> > accept loosing some of the neat stuff.  ;-) 
> 
> Yes, thank you. Since they change with every kernel, I always get them
> confused.

..that tradition breaks with 2.5/2.6 (or is it 3.0?)  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to