Curtis L. Olson writes: > > Hi Norman, > > I appreciate your experience and that your comment is well informed, > but taken at face value, it doesn't do much to inform the rest of us. > Can you list any supporting reasons? That's kind of what I was > angling for in my original posting.
I use OSG it in several projects and keeping a gnu WIN32 port going is a *MAJOR* PITA in fact currently I seem to be the only one who can compile the examples with Cygwin That said OSG is a powerful and rapidly growing library that I appreciate enough to help maintain but I can not reccomend it 'yet' for a cross platform multiprogrammer project such as FGFS. Give it 6 months or so and my opinions might change but for now I reccomend FlightGear staying with SSG appreciating-the-Simple-in-SSG-more-each-dail'ly yr's Norman _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
