Norman Vine writes: > I use OSG it in several projects and keeping a gnu WIN32 port going > is a *MAJOR* PITA > > in fact currently I seem to be the only one who can compile > the examples with Cygwin > > That said OSG is a powerful and rapidly growing library that I > appreciate enough to help maintain but I can not reccomend it > 'yet' for a cross platform multiprogrammer project such as FGFS. > > Give it 6 months or so and my opinions might change but for now > I reccomend FlightGear staying with SSG > > appreciating-the-Simple-in-SSG-more-each-dail'ly yr's
So if I read you right, your beef is more with OSG's cygwin support and less to do with capabilities, performance, etc. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities curt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
