On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:05:54 -0500, David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > but...., IMO there is no reason these all need be in > > the 'core' package, esp when just staying current with the core > > package gets in the way of code development. > > > Is it possible to place all the files for an aircraft in a single > compressed archive, and have FG read them in without permanently > unpacking the whole archive? This will get around the issue of how to > spread the files throughout the base package, as we do now, and it > would be much easier to distribute aircraft. Like fgfs > --aircraft=F16.tgz > > Could we then keep the airplanes in an online hanger? > > And, the piece de resistance, for broadband users could we then load > and run a model over the web? Like fgfs > --aircraft=ftp://www.flightgear.org/hanger/F16.tgz .._sweet_. > Dave > (no, I haven't been drinking) .."tobacco" url? ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
