> I would propose that the server be structured so that a purely > civilian/non-combat version could be run. I don't want it to be > possible for some idiot to come and blow me out of the sky when I'm > practicing ILS approaches in my C172 at my local airport.
I guess there ought to be an explicit flag the user can set at startup stating whether or not they want to be "seen" or not. THe default would be "invisible". > When thinking about the design of such things, it would be good to > consider what kind of separation we can keep between the > military/combat features and the rest of the core simulation. Are there *analogues* to combat that could be made an enjoyable and ethically acceptable part of FlightGear such that those who wanted "simulated combat training" or "historical battle reenactments" to be present could make them be present? Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
