On Tuesday 11 November 2003 10:07, Martin Spott wrote: > David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've been deleting the combat thread unread, but I got the impression > > that there was a lot of heated discussion about military stuff. > > If you would have read it, then you would have got the impression that > it was far not that heated as you'd expected it to be ;-) > > > also (personally) think we're a little heavy on the warbirds > > (especially U.S.) and would like to see more civilian aircraft, > > Although I dislike to see combat features in FlightGear I must admit > that it's quite some fun to fly these birds - there are no civilian > equivalents with that much power and speed .... > > Martin. > -- > Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! >
I'd like to say that it's the capabilities of military aircraft that I find interesting, both in terms of aerodynamics and in the weapon systems. Not the use of them. I know that this is a bit nonsensical as there'd be no desire to develop the capabilities if there wasn't a perceived need for their use. So basically, I wouldn't enjoy combat scenarios much but I'd find the training stuff interesting. LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
