Andy Ross writes:

 > In an attempt to depoliticize the combat flame war as much as
 > possible, it's worth pointing out that, irrespective of people's
 > opinions on the matter, there are not a lot of "combat" features we
 > can really avoid implementing:

I've been deleting the combat thread unread, but I got the impression
that there was a lot of heated discussion about military stuff.  I'd
hate to see FlightGear become nothing more than another shoot-em-up
game, but I think we've already gone too far for that to happen.  I
also (personally) think we're a little heavy on the warbirds
(especially U.S.) and would like to see more civilian aircraft, but
I'm too lazy to get off my behind and make them, so I guess I don't
have a right to complain.

Otherwise, please wake me up when the discussion is over.


All the best,


David

(peaceful but non-dogmatic Canadian)

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to