On Tuesday 06 April 2004 20:25, Jon S Berndt wrote: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:16:18 -0000 > > "Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Erik Hofman said: > >> Your idea of simple is different then mine. Most of the time I know the > >> names I've given objects for 3d animations, I never seem to rememberthe > >> order in which I put them in the file ... > > > >Yep. It just depends on how your brain is organized I think :-) > > Or, "if" ... > > B^P > > Personally, I like the naming scheme better. What ought we do, I ask? > > Jon
How would naming the gear units work with something like the AN-225? It has two nose units and seven mains each side. Each of the sixteen units needs to be animated independently. Also, I believe Nasal has the capability to run through an indexed series - would this still be possible with names? I don't know if these could be problems or not but I thought I'd better mention it. LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
