Norman Vine wrote:
> Frederic Bouvier writes:
> > Norman Vine wrote:
> > > Frederic Bouvier writes:
> > > >>
> > > > > > Also I noticed that in the 9.4 base the runfgfs bat file has
> > > > removed.
> > > > > > Was there a reason for this.
> > > >
> > > > It has been supercede by fgrun that is much user frendly.
> > >
> > > Until fgrun is distributed with FGFS I 'vote' for the batch file being
> > > reinstalled in the distribution.
> > fgrun is installed by fgsetup. It is launched when you double-click on
> > the FG icon.
> Perhaps merntion of this should be made as a 'dependenciy'
> then on http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/source.html
Sorry Norman, but I don't understand. FlightGear does not depend on fgrun.
It is just in the Win32 binary package since 0.9.3 and probably in several
Linux packages as a bonus. runfgfs and runfgfs.bat are still generated by
configure in the source package.
Anyway, the website could mention flightgear related projects but I
presume there was not so much lobbying for this from their authors.
Flightgear-devel mailing list