On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:34:44 Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > hi, > > On Saturday 26 May 2007, Nick Warne wrote: > > I hope not ;-) ... > > What compiler do you use? > What distro?
gcc version 3.4.6 Slack 10 (but heavily updated from source all bar glibc [too scared to update that]). > > > I understand/stood what these options did, and hence why I tried it. I > > do not see any difference at all, other than a 100% 'responsiveness' to > > FG and super FPS. > > > > It what respect does applying a float matrix rather than a double matrix > > do? I cannot see any visible difference - in fact I do, in that it is > > 'cleaner'. > > ??? OK, what I mean by 'cleaner' is more responsive, less 'stutters', and just generally faster all round. I do not see any issues graphically - in fact, cloud layer etc. is better as it all works faster. But, having said all this, I am on a 6 year old Athlon1.2GHz via aBit MoBo - so perhaps to a newer, modern machine this all doesn't matter as it is all rendered faster anyway. Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
