On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:34:44 Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Saturday 26 May 2007, Nick Warne wrote:
> > I hope not ;-) ...
>
> What compiler do you use?
> What distro?

gcc version 3.4.6

Slack 10 (but heavily updated from source all bar glibc [too scared to update 
that]).

>
> > I understand/stood what these options did, and hence why I tried it.  I
> > do not see any difference at all, other than a 100% 'responsiveness' to
> > FG and super FPS.
> >
> > It what respect does applying a float matrix rather than a double matrix
> > do? I cannot see any visible difference - in fact I do, in that it is
> > 'cleaner'.
>
> ???

OK, what I mean by 'cleaner' is more responsive, less 'stutters', and just 
generally faster all round.  I do not see any issues graphically - in fact, 
cloud layer etc. is better as it all works faster.

But, having said all this, I am on a 6 year old Athlon1.2GHz via aBit MoBo - 
so perhaps to a newer, modern machine this all doesn't matter as it is all 
rendered faster anyway.

Nick



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to