Hi Mathias, On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:52:17 Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Well, not that I do not care for older hardware. But I think that we should > better rely on double here. It eases life very much and reduces complexity > in the code ... Remember this is OSG build - not FG. OK. But what restriction implies that a 'user' has to build OSG with float matrix or double matrix then? Surely any implementation of a product that uses OSG will want it's own way to do it? What happens if another application works better with OSG build with float matrix? BTW, I am not debating/arguing here, you coders are the key - I know naff all about the way FG/OSG integration works - I am only relaying my observations when using FG. Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
