I agree with the pa24-250 or other complex single, whether it replaces
pa24 (which I also like but I agree c172p should stay in) or another.

On Dec 4, 2007 3:15 PM, Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Another question: we always have a limited number of aircraft that are
> > in the
> > distribution, with the rest being available as separate downloads. We
> > like to
> > keep the number of aircraft constant, and representative of the many
> > types of
> > aircraft supported by FlightGear. Is there any pressing reason to swap
> > one
> > aircraft for another one? IIRC, there have been some suggestions of
> > replacing
> > the 737 by the 787. FWIW, we currently have the following selection of
> > aircraft (Taken from Makefile.am):
> >
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/UIUC \
>
> Ditch this - I don't think we have any UIUC aircraft in common use (though
> the Wright Flyer might be)
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/c172 \
> >                 data/Aircraft/c172p \
>
> c172p should be included as it is mentioned extensively in the docs and
> has basic tutorials.
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/c310 \
> >                 data/Aircraft/c310u3a \
>
> Much as I like the c310 - it's now very primitive compared with recent
> aircraft. Replace with the Seneca II.
>
> <snip>
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/j3cub \
>
> Include as a nice easy taildragger.
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/Hunter \
> >                 data/Aircraft/p51d \
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/pa28-161 \
>
> I'd suggest replacing this with a complex single, say the pa24-250. Then
> we have a nice progression from training to complex twin.
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/Rascal \
>
> Does anyone actually use this?
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/T38 \
>
> I'm sure that there are better jets, but I'm not familiar with them in
> enough detail to suggest a replacement.
>
> >                 data/Aircraft/ufo \
> >                 data/Aircraft/wrightFlyer1903 \
>
> As Melchior says - ditch as no-one uses it.
>
> I'd also suggest that we include a carrier-capable jet as well - seahawk?
>
> -Stuart
>
>
>       ___________________________________________________________
> Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good 
> http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>



-- 
Hans Fugal
Fugal Computing

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to