James Turner wrote: > I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially > problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e > Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's > the approach I'd take - remove 'using' from headers, and add it to > sources, unless there's only one or two uses, in which case I'll use a > std:: prefix. > > Equally, I'm pretty sure people avoid calling things 'string' or > 'vector' for exactly these reasons, so it's 99.9% unnecessary, as > Melchior said. > > Does this seem reasonable?
Seems good to me. Thanks for the work. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
