dave perry wrote:
> You were correct. I had not set the weather scenario to METAR. I ran
> fgfs once with 3D clouds and once w/o 3D clouds, both with
> real-weather-fetch and scenario METAR. I only got 1 fps with the 3D
> clouds. Earlier with 3D clouds, I got about 21 fps.
I assume you mean "Earlier with 2D clouds, I got about 21fps" ?
That's very low. I'd expect a drop of about 10fps.
What graphics card are you using?
> Also for both 2D
> and 3D clouds, the field elevation is not accounted for in applying the
> cloud base MSL height. The METAR for these 2 runs showed broken at 011
> (translates to 1,100 ft AGL) but leaving KDSM field elevation of 957 ft
> MSL, I was in the clouds by 1100 ft MSL or only about 150 ft AGL. Are
> we not applying the metar field elevation + metar AGL to get the cloud
> level?
This sounds like a bug, though I thought I saw something adding the field
elevation.
I'll check. Thanks for pointing it out.
-Stuart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
