Curtis Olson wrote:
> [....] I think the more of these material settings we can support so
> that the model in the simulation looks just like the model in the 3d
> modeling tool, the better life will be.
Indeed, this will also pave the way for interchangeability between the
various OSG-supported formats. Certainly a good move - which leaves the
orientation of AC3D models as a remaining issue ....
Now, we already have approx. 1k5 3D Scenery models, so chances are high
that quite a few are affected by such a change and I'd be happy to
apply an automated conversion if this is technically possible.
What are we going to do about the users of our Scenery. Should we:
a) leave the Scenery 3D models unchanged until the next software
release, thus leaving users of FlightGear/CVS with strange-looking
3D models;
b) convert the Scenery 3D models _now_ together with the software at
the risk of unsatisfied users of the latest official software
release;
c) sync this sort of major changes with a minor software release ?
My vote goes to c).
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
