On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Anders Gidenstam
<anders-...@gidenstam.org>wrote:
>
>
> An update on the shallow clone:
> git keeps a compressed pack of the data in addition to the working copy.
> When cloning the current fgdata git repository from the map server with
> depth 1 this overhead adds up to about 1 GB. More overhead than I hoped
> for but still less than what one would get with SVN.
>
> It is possible to create and work on local branches even in a shallow
> clone.
>
Another issue to consider is that of migration tools, I'm guessing CVS->SVN
is rather painless, anyone has any idea regarding git and hg?
Here is a nice git vs SVN comparison:
http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
