On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Tom P<zomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > My only concern with SVN is that it stores every file twice in the local > file system, so it's not ideal for the 'data' portion of FlightGear. For > example, right now a complete checkout of Aircraft is ~ 2 GB, and it would > double overnight.
If we had a reliable dependency graph across the data files, it would be easy for developers to check out only those bits of the data tree which the test pilot actually intends to use. I imagine it would be possible for non-developer users who launch through fgrun to perform incremental downloads for the requested scenario, but it seems unlikely to me that there would be much of a benefit there. This comment isn't intended to sway the argument either way; I think all three options under consideration can do selective checkouts (given the graph). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
