On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:20:51 -0500, Curtis wrote in message <cahtsj_cjgngbynczckm2e8fhnct50lmi0yefatxjygtn+_y...@mail.gmail.com>:
> I went with the Vinson because it is spiffier. Everything should > (theoretically) work the same and just as well from the Nimitz. I > believe the deck geometries are identical in FlightGear > (conveniently.) ;-) > > Curt. ..aye, I've had one succesful T/O and climb out, found a ship to orbit, but could not fetch it due to the roll wobbling, the demo UVS eventually dove into the drink. ..the other T/O's emulates those 1902-1903 house boat attempts. Nimitz has catapults and afterburner restistant deck? I pass the bow @ ~80kts, then dives in. Autopilot settings dialogue has an AOA setting, which is the optimum T/O AOA for the f-14b? ..divide by zero errors in lines 78 or 114?: arnt@nb6:~$ fgfs --geometry=1024x600 --enable-fullscreen \ --carrier=Nimitz --aircraft=f-14b-uas & [1] 1417 arnt@nb6:~$ FGMultiplayMgr - No receiver port, Multiplayermode disabled Initializing Liveries HERE: crs = 149.9436573031764 dist = 148.2411422427136 Initializing F-14B Instruments System Initializing F-14B fuel system Initializing Radar Data OpenAL error (AL_ILLEGAL_COMMAND): set_volume OpenAL error (AL_ILLEGAL_COMMAND): set_volume Initializing drone autoflight system. state -> init-settle state -> pretakeoff state -> takeoff state -> climbout state -> route Nasal runtime error: nil used in numeric context at /usr/share/games/FlightGear/Aircraft/f-14b/Nasal/uas-demo.nas, line 78 called from: /usr/share/games/FlightGear/Aircraft/f-14b/Nasal/uas-demo.nas, line 114 AL lib: ALc.c:1420: alcDestroyContext(): deleting 4 Source(s) AL lib: ALc.c:1818: alcCloseDevice(): deleting 165 Buffer(s) [1]+ Done fgfs --geometry=1024x600 --enable-fullscreen --carrier=Nimitz --aircraft=f-14b-uas arnt@nb6:~$ > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Arnt Karlsen <a...@c2i.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:36:45 +0200, Citronnier wrote in message > > <4e7b9c5d.6080...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Le 22/09/2011 22:04, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : > > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message > > > > <CAHtsj_crOGWDX43J5oKw7F6g12AWsRePoceNGW=a1b0txod...@mail.gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote: > > > >>> You seem to be deliberately holding its speed down > > > >>> around 150 - I see air-brakes come up when greater > > > >>> than this, and throttle back - and although flaps (I think > > > >>> full flap?) are still applied, 150 must be quite 'low' > > > >>> for this sleek bird... > > > >>> > > > >> Normal landing approach in the real aircraft I believe is > > > >> about 120 kts? I fly 135 kt approaches in the simulator. It > > > >> should be able to hold 150 kts with the flaps down pretty > > > >> easily. > > > > ..the Navy guys fly approaches using AOA, not speeds, AFAIK. > > > And a max 6000 lbs fuel in the tanks. > > > FG's f-14b is quite tricky to fly with what is *supposed* to be > > > the right AoA for approach. Side departure happen easily if your > > > aren't smooth enough in your final turn. > > > > ..and it does not like to T/O and climb on idle power, all Launch!!! > > button action I see is wild pre-crash oscillations, the Reset button > > tosses me into the cockpit rather than in the camera. > > > > ..Curtis, any reason your demo needs the USS Vinson, rather than a > > renamed USS Nimitz copy? > > > > ..Alexis, any changes to the f-14b since FG-1.9.1? > > > > > Curt, I didn't test yet, sorry, lake of time, but the last mods on > > > properties in engines.nas and instrument.nas should be comited > > > soon. > > > > > > Happy to see you all playing with the beast :-) > > > > > > Alexis > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > > security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this > > data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > > _______________________________________________ > > Flightgear-devel mailing list > > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
