"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> [...] Much of the shared and
> scenery models need similar checking: the windsock is an obvious one.
Given the fact that QA on scenery models (shared as well as static
ones) has always been a bumpy road, I'm pretty much convinced that this
task doesn't fit into a regular release plan - not even for those
models, which are being maintained under the FlightGear umbrella.
I assume that users complaining about ugly models is the only means to
make many of the modellers fix their stuff.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
