On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:46 +0100, Vic Marriott wrote: > > >>> It's probably not so much about memory consuming but more about resource > > consuming. But be assured that most new options are easily turned off. <<< > > Sorry, but I think the point is being missed here. > > Where is the sense in making very impressive advancements to FG, if the > average user has to turn most of them off in order to get a usable fps.
Why does anybody always expect the most imressive results on their old Intel 486DX? Advances in quality always requires more resources. Period. If your hardware doesn't support it, bad for you but be grateful FlightGear at least provides an option to turn to less nifty rendering. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
