Vic wrote: > > > >>> It's probably not so much about memory consuming but more about > > >>> resource > > consuming. But be assured that most new options are easily turned off. > > <<< > > Sorry, but I think the point is being missed here. > > Where is the sense in making very impressive advancements to FG, if the > average user has to turn most of them off in order to get a usable fps. >
The point is that those have halfway decent hardware can use the new features, and those who haven't can't. If we want to make the effort - well that's free. If we could find a way of doing shadows etc. which could run on older hardware then we would. Perhaps as development continues we will be able to optimise the system to find more framerate. By the way - just how old is the hardware you are using? The hardware needed to run this stuff can be picked up on eBay for peanuts. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
