> For the purpose of making the tests more comparable, would not it be > better to use a standard setting/script/options which would set FG to > some defined state?
In this case clearly no. I'm interested in the relative change matrix of framerates for two features being on or off, not in the absolute scale factor (which depends on things like screen resolution, whether the binary is debug mode or release mode, ...). Stuart's post contains all the information I want to know whereas a defined state would not contain that information. I'm simply not interested if some people have an overall faster computer, I know that. I'm interested in relative scaling properties. * Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
