Am 22.11.2012 20:44, schrieb ThorstenB: > On 22.11.2012 10:08, Adrian Musceac wrote: >> I've gone ahead and used the new radio code for navaids, but I have a >> question: which navradio code is considered standard? newnavradio or >> navradio? > > navradio is the current/old standard, newnavradio is the new module. > Most aircraft use "navradio", few "newnavradio". I'm not sure if there > is a plan to switch/replace the old radio at some point, and whether the > new module was compatible with the old etc. But for now, both are there. > TorstenD is the expert here.
The plan was to replace navradio by newnavradio. Due to an "unhandled exception in my real-life's main loop", I have never been able to finish the transition and I will most likely not be able to soon. So please consider navradio as standard. Please, don't add too much code to the old navradio.?xx files but try to encapsulate new functionality within own classes and files and make them as reusable as possible. Torsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
