On Monday, November 26, 2012 19:18:26 James Turner wrote:

> 
> I'll do a review if no-one beats me to it, but this definitely needs to be
> 'off-by-default' for the next release. We can add a checkbox to the
> realism dialog to enable it from the GUI, and give aircraft authors a
> chance to adapt.
> 
> Well, that's my opinion at least.
> 
> James

It's off by default of course. GUI checkbox would be a plus. Right now it's 
using command line properties.
About aircraft authors needing to adapt, I've had a brief look between C172P 
which is ok, and C337 Skymaster which does not display the off flag for 
glideslope when LOC signal still present. It appears to be a case of not 
checking one property set by the glideslope code (old code, not new one).
Aircraft authors basically should not have to worry about whether the new 
system is on or off, and just use the glideslope flag properties like it's 
used in C172p's panel.
Again, this new code does nothing new to the logic of the navradios, except 
realistically computing whether a signal is present or not. 

Cheers,
Adrian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to