On Monday, November 26, 2012 19:18:26 James Turner wrote: > I'll do a review if no-one beats me to it, but this definitely needs to be > 'off-by-default' for the next release. We can add a checkbox to the > realism dialog to enable it from the GUI, and give aircraft authors a > chance to adapt. > > Well, that's my opinion at least. > > James
Emilian pointed out to me that different aircraft can have different types of receivers and antennas for ILS equipment. Of course, if it is desirable, we can make a guideline regarding aircraft developers setting some properties somewhere according to a convention we make. Then we could use these inside the navradio code, so a 747-400 has different equipment behaviour than a Cessna. Also, I'd like to remind everyone who is interested in this that glideslope signals use a different (higher) range of frequencies than VOR/LOC, thus having totally different propagation characteristics, especially in hilly/mountainous terrain. Cheers, Adrian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
