Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 06:24:41 Renk Thorsten a écrit : Hello, Renk
> I hope you have the fairness to ask FredB to remove Rembrandt then as well, > because we need to ship the default rendering scheme such that users > without good graphics cards (the integrated intels for instance) can use FG > at all, and neither Rembrandt not ALS are compatible with default. So, your long answer to explain you don't like Rembrandt and you prefer to work on your own system, as just been underlined there by you. Your conclusion is "REMOVE REMBRANDT and keep up my own development" This clarify to everybody your approach. You want a flightgear without Rembrandt. You claim we have to modify models to get it working with rembrandt, the same kind of work ( more difficult) had to be done when the shaders came up. And what about the FDM improvements? where the updates introduce more time and more difficulty ( talking about JSBSIM, since YASIM seems to be frozen ). Your claim is not receivable, since models must get the best improvements due to the last flightgear version. You claim Rembrandt wants high level Hardware my 9600 GT 512 mb can process it. With An average of 20 fps ( disabling rembrandt and without ALS i never get more than 30 fps). Your ALS systems wants (when it is not crashing my system) a higher level capacity Hardware ( mostly GPU ) to work correctly, with every features. Only the first ALS version tried out 2 years ago was good to me ( and some others later on, but not today) You told us you had the most perfect equipment , you can't evaluate what is good or wrong with low level equipments. > > I mean, what is this really about? You're seriously bothered by a framework > you especially have to activate, which doesn't break any of the features > you like to the degree that you blatantly ignore the significant group of > users who uses ALS and claim to represent 'the community' and invent > 'broken things' for which you can't give a single example'? And you expect > me to... do what? Code what you like instead of what I like? I don't mean i don't like ALS, i mean i don't like your approach , instead of working on consistency with the existing valuable features which were implemented within FlighGear, ( and by including Rembrandt), you ARE WORKING on a other FlightGear. You are working on a flightgear VARIANT, your work is not OPTIONS to flightgear. Others , better than me, tried before me to tell you, you (are) were on the wrong way. Unfortunately we are missing the Emilian's know how, he gave up because of that approach ( because of you). Hello Arnt, Yes English is not my native language, and wrong to me, mostly when i had not talked for a long time ( better with Arabic and partly French ). Ahmad, (Henri) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
