On 07.04.2010, at 00:58, Duncan Gibson wrote:
>>> I have the problem that "indent" doubles up the "const" keyword at
>>> the end of a function description. Very annoying. So maybe "indent"
>>> is not the way to go? Or my particular version is buggy.
>
> Do you have an example? I haven't noticed this.
"char *Fl_Text_Buffer::text_range(int start, int end) const {"
was converted to
"char *Fl_Text_Buffer::text_range(int start, int end) const const {"
I played with "uncrustify" yesterday and it looked good, except that it
re-indented block comments.
Doxyfy would accept this and it would solve these issues:
/**
* \brief A test
* \code
* keep
* my
* indenting
* \endcode
*/
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev