On 07.04.2010, at 00:58, Duncan Gibson wrote:

>>> I have the problem that "indent" doubles up the "const" keyword at
>>> the end of a function description. Very annoying. So maybe "indent"
>>> is not the way to go? Or my particular version is buggy.
> 
> Do you have an example? I haven't noticed this.

"char *Fl_Text_Buffer::text_range(int start, int end) const {"

was converted to 

"char *Fl_Text_Buffer::text_range(int start, int end) const const {"


I played with "uncrustify" yesterday and it looked good, except that it 
re-indented block comments.

Doxyfy would accept this and it would solve these issues:

/**
 * \brief A test
 * \code
 * keep
 *   my 
 *     indenting
 * \endcode
 */

_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to