Michael Meier wrote: > Hi ! > > I personally think there's no problem with the structure or the content of > fltk.org, it's way more informative than most pages of other toolkits IMHO. > > The only thing I would change is the design (colors etc.). It looks kind of > old-fashioned and ... let's say i didn't think fltk would be as great as it > as when I first approached fltk.org ... and that's a pitty.
Well, look-n-feel is highly subjective, and there are limits to how fancy we can get without breaking rendering on a lot of browsers or using up bandwidth (right now averaging about 8Gbytes, 85k visitors, and 1M hits each month...) > Changing the layout shouldn't be a huge problem, maybe it would be enough to > change the stylesheet. I would be glad to help if there's any help wanted. There would be a little more to it than that - you can download the current site sources via SVN and play if you like... > Then maybe provide a better note pointing out that one could/should use a > newsreader to read the "forums" (It took me some days until I recognized > that little sentence at the bottom of the page) and a "real"(tm) FAQ (not > within the articles) and everything should be fine. I think that is more of a front-end issue than anything else - the database is already setup to support categories and is linked to the links/bazaar database. Would something like the links page work better? We could show the different FAQ sections or topics, then you click to show to questions, and then click to view an answer? -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com Internet Printing and Document Software http://www.easysw.com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
