Michael Sweet wrote: > Well, look-n-feel is highly subjective, and there are limits to > how fancy we can get without breaking rendering on a lot of browsers > or using up bandwidth (right now averaging about 8Gbytes, 85k visitors, > and 1M hits each month...)
Yes, your right. I didn't mean a super-fanzy-hip-and-so-web2.0 design ;), just a little bit ... sorry, can't find the right words right now > There would be a little more to it than that - you can download the > current site sources via SVN and play if you like... Ok, I think I'll play with it a little bit. But that won't happen before the end of next week, I'm quite busy right now. > I think that is more of a front-end issue than anything else - the > database is already setup to support categories and is linked to the > links/bazaar database. Would something like the links page work > better? We could show the different FAQ sections or topics, then > you click to show to questions, and then click to view an answer? I think that sounds very nice. Something like that should work fine. Michael Meier _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
