That is a coincidence. Well I'd like to thank everyone who contributed to this thread, it has cleared up any confusion.
FLTK 1.1.x and 1.3.x appear increasingly solid as time goes on. -If you would permit me to hold the mic longer than is comfortable for the audience while I sip my Martini, I must say FLTK is one of the few projects where the people on the project really care that it works correctly. Commercial pressure aside, the longevity of the project has been epic. When it comes to GUI tool kits, in my opinion, nothing else is as simple to use or solid as FLTK. Thanks very much for your toolkit, its awesome. Cameron > > [...] the multitude of FLTK versions is giving me headaches like > > blinding car lights in the night. > > [...] > > Why after 1.1.7 is there 1.1.8 and 1.1.9. What's the difference between > > them? Why is 1.3.x now being developed in the SVN instead of effort > > primarily into the 2.x.x series? > > [...] > > Finally, was it decided to base future FLTK on OpenGL or Cairo? > > By sheer coincidence, last night I decided to make a minor contribution > to FLTK by providing an updated FAQ entry about this, although it does > not answer your last question. > > Go to the Articles&FAQs tab on the web site, and you should be able to > see the old and new versions of "What are the Versions of FLTK" if you > search the FAQs. > > New: http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L825+I0+TFAQ+M20+P1+Q > Old: http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L366+I0+TFAQ+M20+P1+Q > > I would welcome any constructive comments, or points that you feel > should be added or clarified. > > _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
