On 18 Dec 2009, at 17:47, Sparkaround wrote: > Thank you. For this application, I will try fltk-2.x or just give > up support for the win9x.
I would (as is probably already apparent) just drop win9x support. > And I write a sketchy summary: > 1. fltk-1.1.x support most platforms(including full support for the > win9x) , but with least features(do not support CJK) > 2. fltk-1.3.x support least platforms(do not support the win9x),but > it is > the stablest one with many features(including CJK, many widgets) Also unicode is supported. > 3. fltk-2.x support many platforms(support the win9x partly), with > many new features(including full CJK, unicode, but may with less > widgets than 1.3-x) > Is it correct? Almost: fltk-2 was an experimental branch, but it somehow ran out of steam before it ever reached a stable release, and is largely to be unsupported now. If you use fltk-2, you need to be prepared to fix the bugs yourself, as I don't think there's anyone around to help. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
