> Personally, I would not recommend 2.x to anyone at the moment, > unless they're willing to maintain it. > > Last summer a few of the 1.3.x developers noticed FLTK 2.x > support was seriously flagging, and after a poll for activity, > it seemed to "officially" determined to be in limbo; the group > of developers that were maintaining it seemed to have vaporized. > > FLTK 2.x is currently a stalled project in search of > developers/maintainers. > > AFAIK, FLTK 2.x never got to a release stage, and was still in > alpha when it fell into limbo. > > 1.3.x is what all the developers here are continuing to support, > and is the only thing I'd recommend to new projects, as FLTK 1.3.x > has a lot of adopters and maintainers. It's very much like 1.1.x > with many features/fixes/widgets added to it. The API hasn't changed > much between 1.1.x and 1.3.x, but the ABI (binary interface) /has/ > changed.
Thank you. So I give up fltk-2.x. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
