> > On 18 Dec 2009, at 17:47, Sparkaround wrote: > > Thank you. For this application, I will try fltk-2.x or just give > > up support for the win9x. > > I would (as is probably already apparent) just drop win9x support. I come to accept that Fltk-1.3.x is the only suitable one for that project. Yes, I have to drop win9x support for it. Thanks.
And for the new projects using latin character sets only, I will choose between fltk-1.1.x and fltk-1.3.x. For the other new projects, I will just use fltk-1.3.x. > > > And I write a sketchy summary: > > 1. fltk-1.1.x support most platforms(including full support for the > > win9x) , but with least features(do not support CJK) > > 2. fltk-1.3.x support least platforms(do not support the win9x),but > > it is > > the stablest one with many features(including CJK, many widgets) > > Also unicode is supported. Got it. > > > 3. fltk-2.x support many platforms(support the win9x partly), with > > many new features(including full CJK, unicode, but may with less > > widgets than 1.3-x) > > Is it correct? > > Almost: fltk-2 was an experimental branch, but it somehow ran out of > steam before it ever reached a stable release, and is largely to be > unsupported now. > If you use fltk-2, you need to be prepared to fix the bugs yourself, > as I don't think there's anyone around to help. I give up fltk-2.x now. Thanks for your remind. > > > > > _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
