> I'll take a look at the link! > > I don't know if there is a reason we are using fltk-2 instead > of fltk-1.3 (it wasn't my decision, and it isn't my decision > to change it either I'm afraid).
OK - though you might find that leads to difficulties, as there's no one around to fix fltk-2 these days... > How come fltk-2 is unsupported? I'm new to fltk, but I > assumed the 2 meant it was the newer version of fltk? No, fltk-2 was the experimental branch, but it never attained stability and is now generally dormant. That's a FAQ, BTW: http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L825 SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
