MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
> fltk-2 was the experimental branch, but it never attained stability
> and is now generally dormant.
Wow, that's a great and eloquent way of putting it..
+1 for that sentence in the FAQ! ;)
> That's a FAQ, BTW: http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L825
That FAQ item should maybe be updated..
the way it reads now, it sounds like FLTK2 is still in progress, just
slow.
It should really underline how dead-stop FLTK 2 really is at the moment.
I like Ian's comment above; if that were line #1 in the FLTK2 faq
comment,
I think the message would be very clear.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
