> > fltk-2 was the experimental branch, but it never attained stability > > and is now generally dormant. > > Wow, that's a great and eloquent way of putting it.. > +1 for that sentence in the FAQ! ;) > > > That's a FAQ, BTW: http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L825 > > That FAQ item should maybe be updated.. > the way it reads now, it sounds like FLTK2 is still in progress, just > slow. > > It should really underline how dead-stop FLTK 2 really is at the moment. > > I like Ian's comment above; if that were line #1 in the FLTK2 faq > comment, > I think the message would be very clear.
I can update the article a bit later this evening, no problem. It struck me earlier that the Quick Info panel on the home page has the fltk-2 snapshot on it, and even though the revision number is way below the fltk-1.3 revision number, people might not notice. It might be useful to have a link to the article in that panel too. D _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
