--- twhid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my favorite part of the review was putting "conceptual"
> between quotes.
yes, that's one of the many...
my beef is that here in dallas there's a lot of bitchin'
and moanin' (usually from critics) about why houston and
even ft. worth get all of the good shows. and the
complaints continue to surround the idea of how dallas
wants to think of itself as cosmopolitan, but never "takes
chances" (for want of a better phrase). so, now we get
something interesting and, actually, of the 20th century
(now that we're in the 21st) and a review shows up in the
"alternative" weekly, mind you - not the conservative
"dallas morning news" - and the woman immediately rips the
museum and publishes a scatterbrained review based
on...well, i don't know what...
i'm sure if the grand dame dr. fluxbuxenstein (dr. j.) is
still on the list, she'd have some stories to tell!
r~
> what does one expect from Bush country? (not to denigrate
> the texans
> on the list, i mean, we new yorkers have censor-happy
> guiliani to
> deal with) - the majority of americans are suspicious of
> and
> generally loath any art that isn't of the portrait /
> landscape
> variety. she's just writing for her audience.
>
> --
> <twhid>
> http://www.mteww.com
> </twhid>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
