At 7:19 PM +0200 7/31/01, Petr Andrs wrote:
>I think there is other reason for formatters beeing not production redy
>as well. This reason is that XSL FO is only in CR state of its first
>version. I think 1.1 or 2.0 XSL FO Recomendation will be far better.
>
I don't think that's it. I haven't found any cases where XSL FO was insufficiently
expressive for my needs (essentially laying out a computer book). There've been a
couple of cases where Docbook was insufficiently expressive, but there are workarounds
for that. The problems I encountered were all in implementation, not in the language.
A new version of XSLFO wouldn't really help me any.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
