That sounds like a good suggestion.

To start with I think we should consider only this:
FOP behaves exactly the same but instead of having its own pdf generation 
code then iText is used as a library to generate pdf.

So the questions are:
- is the license useable
- is the api sufficient for FOP to use

Once this is sorted out then we can think of other areas.

On 2002.03.12 15:05 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> From: "New, Cecil (GEAE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > My suggestion was *not* to merge the two!
> >
> > iText is a Java API with a document creation focus.  In this day and
> age,
> > XSL:FO can be viewed as just another document type - in the same way
> that
> > more proprietary or older formats are (that is, PDF, RTF, etc.).
> 
> Sorry if it's a bit off-topic, but this issue is similar to the one we
> just
> managed to handle between POI (http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/) and Cocoon
> (http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/).
> 
> POI is a project that makes it possible to read-write common office file
> formats in Java.
> Cocoon is an XML processing framework-server.
> 
> The POI team donated a Cocoon component that uses POI and outputs XML,
> but
> on the Cocoon side, committers saw too much POI code in it.
> 
> Basically we understood that a project to read-write a file format should
> have a solid Java API. Other projects can use it to produce other
> results.
> Merging is not the best solution, both for developers and users.
> 
> >From this experience, I would humbly suggest that, after getting the
> licencing stuff straight, FOP could be refactored to use iText as a PDF
> generation step.
> In this way communities can focus on a smaller part of the project with
> greater efficiency, and the two products may have a much wider
> applicability
> than a single merged one.
> 
> Since iText has a strong community behind it, since it would like to
> integrate code with FOP, thus coming to Apache, and since FOP could use
> part
> of it proficiently, I would like to see iText make a proposal at Jakarta
> for
> the creation of a project.
> All details for this are under
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html .
> 
> What do you think?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to