From: "alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 14:27 12/03/02, Keiron Liddle wrote: > > > FOP behaves exactly the same but instead of having its own pdf > > generation code then iText is > > used as a library to generate pdf. > > I agree that if anything iText could be considered as a "plugin" for PDF > generation and FOP as an XSL:FO processor which could use iText to generate > the end result. I think however it would require a significant software > change which I am not qualified to estimate. Those more familiar with the > FOP source code can evaluate that. > > > > So the questions are: > > > - is the license useable > > > - is the api sufficient for FOP to use > > A look at Sourceforge tells us that the licenCes (bloody Americans can't > spell English words) are > License: GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Mozilla Public License 1.1 > > If Bruno is still the copyright holder then he can presumably simply "add" > an Apache-style licence. > I don't feel comfortable using the LGPL for this and don't know about the > Mozilla license.
Any *GPL licenced stuff cannot go in Apache CVS. If the code goes in the Apache CVS, it must have Apache licen(c|s)e. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]