I've greatly improved the FO schema I've been working on. I've added patterns for most of the attribute types. I'd appreciate it if some folks would run their FO documents through a validator against this schema and respond with where I've done a less than excellent job.
The schema as delivered is for the full FO spec. I've created <group>s and <attributeGroup>s that segregate those elements and attributes implemented and not-implemented in FOP. To make this an FOP only schema, remove those groups and attributeGroups with "_Not" in their names. A couple of items I've noticed: FOP allows some elements, like fo:table-cell and fo:flow to be empty when the spec says they must be non-empty FOP allows the contents of some elements like simple-page-master to be in any order when the spec insists on a defined order Chuck Paussa
fop4e.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
