Comments intermingled.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.U. Anderegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 13, 2002 5:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: AW: Latest FOP schema
>
> J. Pietschmann wrote:
>
> <fo:block> are
>
> > Rectangular areas, perhaps indented and with border, padding
> > and other individual traits, nested into a rectangular area.
>
> I understand setting traits, properties. How about page layout, setting
> inline and baseline postitions? Does it imply a unconditional CRLF?
It's not that there is a "CRLF", or anything like it, after a block, but
rather that if it is succeeded by block-level siblings that they will be
stacked in the block-progression-direction, so the effect will be the same.
Can you be more specific with respect to the other questions?
> What does the input below look look like on the page?
>
> <fo:block>
> level_0_text fills to position A
> <fo:block>
> level_1_text positioned at A fills to position B
> </fo:block>
> more level_0_text positioned at B
> </fo:block>
I think the predominant opinion is (assume all of this fits on one page) -
a normal block area (generated by the outer block) that contains:
one or more line areas for "level_0_text fills to position A";
then a block area with one or more line areas for "level_1_text positioned
at A fills to position B";
finally more line areas for "more level_0_text positioned at B".
Note that if your example had been
<fo:block>
level_0_text fills to position A<fo:block>
level_1_text positioned at A fills to position B
</fo:block>more level_0_text positioned at B
</fo:block>
then it would still be the same.
Regards,
AHS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]