Comments intermingled. > -----Original Message----- > From: J.U. Anderegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: May 13, 2002 5:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AW: AW: Latest FOP schema > > J. Pietschmann wrote: > > <fo:block> are > > > Rectangular areas, perhaps indented and with border, padding > > and other individual traits, nested into a rectangular area. > > I understand setting traits, properties. How about page layout, setting > inline and baseline postitions? Does it imply a unconditional CRLF?
It's not that there is a "CRLF", or anything like it, after a block, but rather that if it is succeeded by block-level siblings that they will be stacked in the block-progression-direction, so the effect will be the same. Can you be more specific with respect to the other questions? > What does the input below look look like on the page? > > <fo:block> > level_0_text fills to position A > <fo:block> > level_1_text positioned at A fills to position B > </fo:block> > more level_0_text positioned at B > </fo:block> I think the predominant opinion is (assume all of this fits on one page) - a normal block area (generated by the outer block) that contains: one or more line areas for "level_0_text fills to position A"; then a block area with one or more line areas for "level_1_text positioned at A fills to position B"; finally more line areas for "more level_0_text positioned at B". Note that if your example had been <fo:block> level_0_text fills to position A<fo:block> level_1_text positioned at A fills to position B </fo:block>more level_0_text positioned at B </fo:block> then it would still be the same. Regards, AHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]