Hi Chuck, This looks very good. I think we should put this somewhere on the site when it is ready.
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 23:30, Chuck Paussa wrote: > I've greatly improved the FO schema I've been working on. I've added > patterns for most of the attribute types. I'd appreciate it if some > folks would run their FO documents through a validator against this > schema and respond with where I've done a less than excellent job. > > The schema as delivered is for the full FO spec. I've created <group>s > and <attributeGroup>s that segregate those elements and attributes > implemented and not-implemented in FOP. To make this an FOP only schema, > remove those groups and attributeGroups with "_Not" in their names. > > A couple of items I've noticed: > > FOP allows some elements, like fo:table-cell and fo:flow to be empty > when the spec says they must be non-empty > FOP allows the contents of some elements like simple-page-master to be > in any order when the spec insists on a defined order I'm sure there are many more cases where something is not enforced. > Chuck Paussa --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
