On Saturday 02 November 2002 10:35, Victor Mote wrote:
>. . .I would also recommend that, in the above case,
> we actually put the code into two different projects. 
>. . .

+1, I like the idea.

How about moving the "new" code (HEAD) to a separate (xml-fop2) CVS project 
to clarify things, and maybe name the new version "fop 2" instead of 1.0x?

Although the current version is 0.20.x, it *is* used in production at a 
number of sites, so going directly to version 2.x for a mostly new codebase 
makes sense IMHO.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to