On Saturday 02 November 2002 10:35, Victor Mote wrote: >. . .I would also recommend that, in the above case, > we actually put the code into two different projects. >. . .
+1, I like the idea. How about moving the "new" code (HEAD) to a separate (xml-fop2) CVS project to clarify things, and maybe name the new version "fop 2" instead of 1.0x? Although the current version is 0.20.x, it *is* used in production at a number of sites, so going directly to version 2.x for a mostly new codebase makes sense IMHO. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
